- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 22:15:51 -0400
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
I am within a day or so of fulfulling my action item to the DM task force, which was to draft specific text for review. Even though it is rough and represents only my personal cut, I will cc: distApp. Suggest you wait and ask again if not clear then. Simple answer: PASWA requires that you know that some things are in the form of base64Binary. Schema processing is one way to check this, but it's just an option and is not required. You might know for other reasons, including (quite likely) that you synthesized the data in that form. The DM formulation adopts the terminology of the Query data model, but doesn't change any of the rules or reasoning embodied in PASWA. The hope is that by using that terminology we (a) avoid reinventing the wheel on terminology for typed infosets and (b) increase the chance that if someone ever does want to do a feature for transmitting or signing fully typed data models, that we will have shown the way for optimzing such transmissions. Thank you! ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> 08/19/2003 09:31 PM To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org Subject: Re: The XML Query Data Model and PASWA Noah, I don't fully understand the XQuery data model, but I am curious as to whether your two formulations (variant #1 and #2 at [1]) affect the fact that SOAP 1.2 does not require XML schema processing. Thanks! -Anish -- [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2003Jun/0004.html
Received on Friday, 22 August 2003 00:53:38 UTC