Re: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed

Personally, I don't quite see this as very different from what we 
have today, or from what Gudge proposed earlier, section headings 
apart. (I.e. I feel the spec is ok as is.)


Joseph Reagle wrote:
> Role Name:
> 	next
> Identifier:
> Definition
> 	Any SOAP node that receives and processing a SOAP message as defined
> 	in section 2.6 
> Conformance:
> 	By definition, all SOAP nodes except the originating node MUST
> 	conform to this role.

Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 03:37:50 UTC