W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:38:06 +0200
Message-ID: <3D940ADE.3040106@crf.canon.fr>
To: reagle@w3.org
CC: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, XMLP Public <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "Hoelzing Gerd" <gerd.hoelzing@sap.com>

Personally, I don't quite see this as very different from what we 
have today, or from what Gudge proposed earlier, section headings 
apart. (I.e. I feel the spec is ok as is.)


Joseph Reagle wrote:
> Role Name:
> 	next
> Identifier:
> 	http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next
> Definition
> 	Any SOAP node that receives and processing a SOAP message as defined
> 	in section 2.6 
> Conformance:
> 	By definition, all SOAP nodes except the originating node MUST
> 	conform to this role.
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 03:37:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:52 UTC