W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:05:28 -0400
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-Id: <200209261705.28566.reagle@w3.org>

On Thursday 26 September 2002 04:23 pm, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> OK.  I guess I like to be particularly careful in a situation where the
> wording has been such a problem and where, in this case an outside
> respondent, has proposed a specific format as a resolution to an issue
> that wouldn't close.   We're agreeing:  it's only a question of how
> careful we want to be to avoid misunderstandings.  Thanks.

BTW: I'm not advocating for a short name, nor that particular format; I was 
just using that as a way in which the identifier, the definition/behaviour, 
and conformance requirements are more explicit. (In the XKMS spec I'm 
trying to ensure all identifiers have a meaning, and every MUST/MAY/SHOULD 
has some subject and (testable) requirement:
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 17:07:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:52 UTC