- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:05:28 -0400
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Thursday 26 September 2002 04:23 pm, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > OK. I guess I like to be particularly careful in a situation where the > wording has been such a problem and where, in this case an outside > respondent, has proposed a specific format as a resolution to an issue > that wouldn't close. We're agreeing: it's only a question of how > careful we want to be to avoid misunderstandings. Thanks. BTW: I'm not advocating for a short name, nor that particular format; I was just using that as a way in which the identifier, the definition/behaviour, and conformance requirements are more explicit. (In the XKMS spec I'm trying to ensure all identifiers have a meaning, and every MUST/MAY/SHOULD has some subject and (testable) requirement: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2002Sep/0024.html )
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 17:07:02 UTC