- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 05:04:00 -0700
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
The feedback we have internally is that the distinction is unnecessary, so we support removing the array representation for an RPC invocation. Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] > Sent: 31 August 2002 23:00 > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: Issue 298: RPC array representation unneccesary > > > > I'm inclined to agree with the commentator[1] on this, the > only difference between the struct and array case really is > that duplicate edge labels are allowed in the array case. I'm > not convinced of the utility of that distinction and I think > the spec would be clearer if we only speced the struct case. > That said, I'd like to defer this issue for a week while > Henrik and I get some more feedback from implementers inside > Microsoft. > > Thanks > > Gudge > > [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x298 > >
Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 08:04:34 UTC