Re: Issue 374: use of term "part" in attachment feature document from Herve Ruellan on 2002-09-16 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Herve Ruellan <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:56:12 +0200
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <3D85C6DC.8030505@crf.canon.fr>

Hi Henrik,

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> Compound SOAP structure 
> 
> A compound SOAP structure consists of a primary SOAP message part and
> zero or more related secondary parts. The use of the term "part" in this
> specification is independent of its use in other specifications and
> should not be assumed to be identical.

This looks good to me. I would just prefer to put less emphasis on the 
second sentence by either putting it between parenthesis or by moving it 
a the end of "3. Terminology" (i.e. a few lines below) as a note.

Hervé.

Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 07:56:08 UTC