- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:02:33 +0200
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Personally, I'd recommend no-action, since the glossary section[1] already contains definition for "Primary SOAP message part" and "Secondary part". This, IMO, is enough to disambiguate the term "part". Jean-Jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-af-20020814/#terminology Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > In connection with issue 374 [0] I took an action item to provide a > clarifying sentence indicating that the term "part" in AF [1] is not > related to the term used in other contexts like WSDL and MIME. > > The proposal is that we in section 3 "Terminology" [3] add a sentence so > that the definition of a Compound SOAP structure reads (last sentence is > new): > > * * * * * > > Compound SOAP structure > > A compound SOAP structure consists of a primary SOAP message part and > zero or more related secondary parts. The use of the term "part" in this > specification is independent of its use in other specifications and > should not be assumed to be identical. > > * * * * * > > Comments? > > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com > > [0] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x375 > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-af-20020814/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-af-20020814/#terminology >
Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 05:02:37 UTC