RE: Issue 356: Allow unqualified elements as children of Body from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2002-09-12 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:44:24 -0700
To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Cc: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D08E92198@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

+1 but we may also want to remove "such" to make it parse better:

   Zero or more information items in its
   [children] property. Child element
   information items MAY be namespace
   qualified.

Ok?

Henrik

>I like the direction of this proposal. In the spirit of a friendly 
>amendment I would remove the 'element' from the first paragraph above 
>such that it reads:
>
>   Zero or more information items in its
>   [children] property. Such child element
>   information items MAY be namespace
>   qualified.
>
>This generalizes the description of the Body EII to explicitly allow 
>other types of EII.

Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 16:45:04 UTC