W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Issue 302: Graph edges that do not terminate

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:31:49 -0400
To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Cc: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, XMLP Dist App <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFBAE2881E.8F9A5475-ON85256C30.006A9340@lotus.com>

You point out that RPC rules out more than a single child header.  Where 
do we stand on encodings that span from body to header?  Though I 
certainly not encourage it, that would allow in principle for one root to 
be in a header (my X element) and another in the Body, even for RPC.  So, 
I think it's important for interop that we be clear on what is and is not 
allowed, and what the interpretation of each legal form is in terms of 
graphs.  I'm still a bit vague on what the status quo is saying.  Thanks.

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2002 15:33:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:52 UTC