Re: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed

I'm not sure if my question has been answered. I'm looking at [3] and the 
text reads, "Each SOAP intermediary and the ultimate SOAP receiver MUST act 
in this role and MAY additionally assume zero or more other SOAP roles." I 
think the change is that this is supposed to be a definition of the "role 
name" instead of the (previous) "role". But it still doesn't seem that 
useful a definition to me unless the definition of the NEXT role is that 
it's the thing which all SOAP nodes are. However, I suspect the difficulty 
here is that there's not a specific location in the specification that 
defines what a NEXT agent does, instead it's distributed throughout the 
spec...?

On Wednesday 04 September 2002 10:27 pm, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> If the members of the WG believe this does not reflect the intended
> resolution, please let the editors know ASAP.  xmlp-comments should be
> deleted from the distribution of any replies to this note.  Thank you.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues#x250
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Aug/0034.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part1.xml#soaproles

Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 15:09:21 UTC