- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:56:11 -0400
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
If we make these suggested changes then we'll have to do lots of work on the HTTP binding since it doesn't talk about 'sending' or 'receiving' states, only 'sending + receiving' and receiving + sending'. I'm not saying that this is the wrong thing to do, only that the consequences of the change are larger than suggested :-(. Marc. On Tuesday, Sep 3, 2002, at 11:47 US/Eastern, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > > Issue 305 [1] states that: > > It is unclear why this MEP needs the sending+receiving states in > the state machines when there is nothing really that is sent from > the requester to the responder. This also affects the states > figure. > > Proposal: > > I agree with this statement and think we should simplify the SOAP > response state machine to only reflect a SOAP message in the response > as > follows: > > 1) In the requesting SOAP node diagram in [3], rename "Sending + > Receiving" to "Receiving". > > 2) In the responding SOAP node diagram in [3], rename "Receiving + > Sending" to "Sending". > > 3) In table 11 [4] and 12 [5], perform the same rename operations. > > 4) In section 6.3.4, rename "Receiving + Sending" to "Sending". > > FWIW, I would consider this an editorial change as a result of > copy-and-paste from the req/res MEP. Reason is that it is related to > issue 239 [2] which also shows signs of copy-and-paste problems. > > Comments? > > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x305 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x239 > [3] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#bindformdesc2 > [4] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12- > part2.xml#tabreqstatetran > s2 > [5] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12- > part2.xml#tabresstatetran > s2 > > -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 13:56:13 UTC