- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 18:34:12 +0200
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1, I had indeed proposed[1] a similar change initially. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2002May/0079.html Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > > Issue 305 [1] states that: > > It is unclear why this MEP needs the sending+receiving states in > the state machines when there is nothing really that is sent from > the requester to the responder. This also affects the states > figure. > > Proposal: > > I agree with this statement and think we should simplify the SOAP > response state machine to only reflect a SOAP message in the response as > follows: > > 1) In the requesting SOAP node diagram in [3], rename "Sending + > Receiving" to "Receiving". > > 2) In the responding SOAP node diagram in [3], rename "Receiving + > Sending" to "Sending". > > 3) In table 11 [4] and 12 [5], perform the same rename operations. > > 4) In section 6.3.4, rename "Receiving + Sending" to "Sending". > > FWIW, I would consider this an editorial change as a result of > copy-and-paste from the req/res MEP. Reason is that it is related to > issue 239 [2] which also shows signs of copy-and-paste problems. > > Comments? > > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x305 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x239 > [3] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#bindformdesc2 > [4] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#tabreqstatetran > s2 > [5] > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml#tabresstatetran > s2 >
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:34:25 UTC