- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:00:14 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Gudge,
I think issue 366 is more than just a variation on 297. It talks
about RPC representation, which relates it to issue 298, for
example, but extending that issue.
If 297 is resolved by removing generics, 366 will disappear, but
if generics are retained, 366 may cause them to be used for RPC
representation.
So, I don't think it's a dupe.
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote:
>
> I propose we close this issue[1] as a duplicate of 297[2]
>
> Gudge
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x366
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x297
>
Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 04:00:21 UTC