- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Gudge,
I don't know if I agree with this simple resolution. If we make
it so, we lose the information that an ID was missing.
I believe the ideal solution is one where the fault code is
env:Sender/rpc:BadArguments/enc:MissingID. I think we can achive
this by saying in [2] that "if other subcodes are available (e.g.
MissingID if SOAP Encoding is used), they SHOULD be subcodes to
the BadArguments subcode".
What do you think?
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote:
>
> I propose we close this issue[1] by adding text to[2] stating that the
> rpc:BadArguments faultcode takes precedence over the MissingID faultcode
> ( and others of that ilk )
>
> Gudge
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x292
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/#rpcfaults
>
Received on Sunday, 1 September 2002 10:43:52 UTC