Re: Issue 303: fault for broken array attributes?

 the spec can also be made consistent by removing some subcodes. 
If we do no action, the spec may strike newcomers as inconsistent.
 Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation

On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote:

 > Regarding Issue 303[1], I propose that the issue be closed with no
 > action. The env:Sender fault code already covers these cases ( and
 > others such as missing elements in a Fault for example ).
 > If we embark on a path of defining new top-level fault codes or
 > sub-codes for all the possible ways in which a message can be malformed,
 > we will be here for a long time.
 > Gudge

Received on Sunday, 1 September 2002 10:20:07 UTC