RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2002-10-18 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:03:19 -0700
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "XMLP Dist App" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>, "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <5C39F806F9939046B4B1AFE652500A3A034B2B29@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

I agree that such a table would be a great addition to the spec.

From a purely editorial POW, I wonder whether a non-normative appendix
would be appropriate given that the exact rules are already elsewhere in
the spec. That way, we avoid the confusion of which version is "the one
that rules them all" :)

Henrik 

>Since this seem to be found of interest, here's a further update 
>with "mustUnderstand" added.

Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 14:03:59 UTC