- From: Herve Ruellan <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:42:23 +0200
- To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Marc Hadley wrote: > On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 11:03 US/Eastern, Herve Ruellan wrote: > >> >> Here is a list of the places where we still use QNames in both part 1 >> [2] and part 2 [3] of the spec: >> >> 2) Part 1, 5.4.7 VersionMismatchFaults >> The Envelope EII of the Upgrade EII has an AII called 'qname' of type >> xs:QName. This attribute contains the XML qualified name of an >> Envelope supported by a SOAP node. >> >> Proposal: >> --------- >> (i) Keep the use of QNames in 2), 3), 4), 5), and 6) >> <rationale> >> We really want QNames in those places. >> </rationale> >> > Why do we 'really want' a QName for 2. Wouldn't the namespace URI of the > envelope version be sufficient ? That's correct, we could just use the namespace URI of the envelope version. It seems even more 'natural' than giving the QName of the envelope EII. Thanks for noticing this. Hervé.
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 07:42:15 UTC