- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:26:59 -0400
- To: "Herve Ruellan" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 11:03 US/Eastern, Herve Ruellan wrote: > > Here is a list of the places where we still use QNames in both part 1 > [2] and part 2 [3] of the spec: > > 2) Part 1, 5.4.7 VersionMismatchFaults > The Envelope EII of the Upgrade EII has an AII called 'qname' of type > xs:QName. This attribute contains the XML qualified name of an > Envelope supported by a SOAP node. > > Proposal: > --------- > (i) Keep the use of QNames in 2), 3), 4), 5), and 6) > <rationale> > We really want QNames in those places. > </rationale> > Why do we 'really want' a QName for 2. Wouldn't the namespace URI of the envelope version be sufficient ? Regards, Marc -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 13:26:55 UTC