- From: Grahame Grieve <grahame@kestral.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:58:48 +1100
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> >Hmm, I don't follow. The difference is that the same entity is >returned on a 404 versus a 200 response. If the origin server is >misconfigured, then that's a problem that needs fixing. But as a >client, I can't second guess what I'm told. right. Even if the HTTP status code is 200, if the application receives a fault, it really has little choice in practice than to interpret it as a fault. If one was to insist that a fault was accompanied by a 4x or 5x response, then the application might be left in the somewhat ridiculous position of having a fault that said that the server returned a http OK response but the soap packet had a fault - instead of simply having the [real] fault Grahame
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2002 16:05:52 UTC