> >> Are you pointing out a possible replacement for the current abtract? > > No, though if the group wants the change, it's OK with me. I'm just not > entirely comfortable with Jacek's choice of a, b, or c, so I offered a > formulation that made somewhat more sense to me. Thank you. I would be against changing the abstract. What's currently there satisfies both the tunneling and chameleon camps, AFAIK. This description only meets the definition of the tunnelists. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.comReceived on Wednesday, 27 March 2002 15:23:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:48 UTC