- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:23:14 +0100
- To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- CC: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Paul,
Re. the second (internal) reference, here is the relevant excerpt. I am sorry
you were not able to read it.
Jean-Jacques.
----------------------------------------
<quote>
Chair, editors, W3C team and WG,
I took an action item at the telcon this week to trawl our mailing lists for
possible new issues. The results of looking at xmlp-comments are as follows;
There is 1 general issue against the spec, 1 issue against Part 1 and two
typos in the Primer as detailed below.
Regards
Martin Gudgin
DevelopMentor
New Issues
General
a) The commentator suggests we split the spec ( like XSL was split ) into
SOAP-Messaging, SOAP-RPC, SOAP HTTP Binding ( and possibly
SOAP-Encoding )[6]
Comment: Comment seems to be mainly concerned with interoperability,
optionality of pieces and the different perceptions people have of 'what
SOAP is'.
Resolution: Argue that having part 1 and part 2 is enough of a split.
<snip/>
</quote>
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2002 03:25:05 UTC