W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Need new MEP for SMTP binding

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:12:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200203151312.IAA18139@markbaker.ca>
To: skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Williams, Stuart)
Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org

> The off-list discussion that I remember was mostly about drawing the line
> between tunneling and non tunneling... and I think our views differ, but
> probably in shades of gray. I have more trouble recollecting a particular
> discussion about exchange patterns and SMTP.

Right.  IMO, tunneling and "doing request response" over SMTP are
opposite sides of the same coin.

> > 
> > I wouldn't be against skipping this entire exercise.
> Not sure which exercise you're referring to here... the AI's that you and
> Jacek took or the whole Email Binding 'exercise'?

The whole email binding exercise.

Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@planetfred.com
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Friday, 15 March 2002 08:21:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:47 UTC