- From: Hurley, Oisin <oisin.hurley@iona.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 19:50:08 -0000
- To: <xml-dist-app@w3c.org>
Requirement 301a in [1] states: "The XMLP specification must clearly identify conformance requirements in a way that enables the conformance of an implementation of the specification to be tested" Issue 36 [2] contains a proposal that the working group will make available a document that specifies conformance requirements. The draft SOAP 1.2 testable assertions document available at [3] makes the statement that "It is incorrect to claim to be compliant with the SOAP Version 1.2 specification by passing successfully all the tests provided in this test suite. An implementation which would pass all the tests below may claim to be compliant with the test suite dated $Date: 2002/03/12 14:23:17 $." This (rather odd) syntax stands as the current conformance statement. Since the test suite is still in draft form, this statement may be considered to be prototypical and will be more accurately stated when the test suite is finalized. The proposed final form of the conformance statement is: "A SOAP 1.2 implementation that passes all of the tests specified in this document may claim to conform to the SOAP 1.2 Test Suite (insert version number)." The value of conformance is its role as a guarantee of basic protocol interoperability. If SOAP 1.2 implementations that pass the test suite are not compliant, then the test suite (and maybe the specification) needs to be revisited. regards Oisin [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlp-reqs/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x36 [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/03/11/soap-1.2-conformance.html
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 14:50:10 UTC