- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:12:50 +0200
- To: "Williams Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "'Herve Ruellan'" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Shouldn't this "extension" be documented in Part 2? Is this a new LC issue? Jean-Jacques. "Williams, Stuart" wrote: > <snip/> > > Ok... however, I think that this is an extension of the convention described > in Part 2 section 5 [1]. > > What I think that you are allowing is a property value to be a reference to > another context structure of some kind (in this case you've called it a > Compound SOAP structure) which is itself another property container. Cool... > hadn't thought of that. > > <snip/> > > What you're introducing (which extends the model at [1]) is almost a way of > doing complex value typing for property values (by reference to a > subordinate context that carries an expected set of property values). Yes... > I think that is neater than extending out the property names with facits > (which is also an extension to the model BTW).
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 05:13:12 UTC