- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:17:28 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- cc: ylafon@w3.org, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Marc, it does indeed seem like an issue. 8-)
Yves, please log the issue, the email about it would be
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jul/0012.html
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Marc Hadley wrote:
> Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> > Marc,
> > the way I was reading that text was that "if, when accessing the
> > compound type, the edges are accessed by their label only, the
> > element qname is the label. If they are accessed by position, the
> > label is ignored and so is the element qname then." Basically,
> > "distinguishing between accessors" I understand as "what I use to
> > get one of them", not "how are they different".
> >
> Hmmm, I think we may have stumbled on an issue here - do you agree ?
>
> Regards,
> Marc.
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 10:17:39 UTC