RE: Draft of position on SOAP's use of XML Internal subset

Yet again, I agree with Noah.  I think that the IETF document came after the
XMLP group correctly identified and solved this problem.  I recall the IETF
motivation after XMLP's decision, not the other way around.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
> [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 8:19 PM
> To: Rich Salz
> Cc: fallside@us.ibm.com; xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Draft of position on SOAP's use of XML Internal subset
>
>
>
> Interesting suggestion, but I'm not sure it actually fits
> this particular
> note, the purpose of which is to report the reasons that led
> the protocols
> WG to the decision we made.  I don't recall anyone in the WG
> referencing
> the RFC, so historically I'm not sure it's the reason WE made the
> decision.  I certainly think it would be a sensible pointer
> to contribute
> to the Tag discussion (unless someone on the Protocols WG
> corrects me that
> we did use the IETF draft as motivation.)  Thanks in any case.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
> Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
> 12/04/2002 10:57 PM
>
>
>         To:     "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com"
> <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
>         cc:     "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>,
> "fallside@us.ibm.com"
> <fallside@us.ibm.com>
>         Subject:        Re: Draft of position on SOAP's use
> of XML Internal subset
>
>
>
> i think it would be worthwhile to reference the IETF RFC on "XML best
> practices," particular around the "external entities make security
> types nervous" part.
>                  /r$
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 01:44:52 UTC