- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 23:18:30 -0500
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: "fallside@us.ibm.com" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Interesting suggestion, but I'm not sure it actually fits this particular note, the purpose of which is to report the reasons that led the protocols WG to the decision we made. I don't recall anyone in the WG referencing the RFC, so historically I'm not sure it's the reason WE made the decision. I certainly think it would be a sensible pointer to contribute to the Tag discussion (unless someone on the Protocols WG corrects me that we did use the IETF draft as motivation.) Thanks in any case. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 12/04/2002 10:57 PM To: "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> cc: "xml-dist-app@w3.org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "fallside@us.ibm.com" <fallside@us.ibm.com> Subject: Re: Draft of position on SOAP's use of XML Internal subset i think it would be worthwhile to reference the IETF RFC on "XML best practices," particular around the "external entities make security types nervous" part. /r$
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 23:20:22 UTC