- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:09:26 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Lars von Wedel <lvonwedel@hotmail.com>
- cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Lars, at least the Email binding proposed by the XMLP WG [1] presently favors the application approach - correlation can be done using SOAP headers carrying the necessary ID. Such a solution will also help when moving at least one direction of the communication from email to other messaging transports. Best regards, Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation http://www.systinet.com/ [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-soap12-email-20020626 On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Lars von Wedel wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm interested in wiring SOAP via SMTP/POP/IMAP/... I saw a couple > of proposals as well as some messages on the list and the current > state of an email binding (let me call it like this) seems to be > an ongoing discussion. > > My goal is to extend an existing SOAP implementation using HTTP > towards sending via SMTP and retrieving via POP/IMAP. > > The main question I have at this time is how to establish a > correspondence > between a requests and its response: I've seen proposals for using > the Message-ID and In-reply-to headers, but somewhere else I read > that correspondence should be handled on the application level. > > What is the (currently) preferred view of handling request/response > correlation for SOAP over Email? > > Lars >
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 05:09:29 UTC