- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:09:26 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Lars von Wedel <lvonwedel@hotmail.com>
- cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Lars,
at least the Email binding proposed by the XMLP WG [1] presently
favors the application approach - correlation can be done using
SOAP headers carrying the necessary ID. Such a solution will also
help when moving at least one direction of the communication from
email to other messaging transports.
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-soap12-email-20020626
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Lars von Wedel wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in wiring SOAP via SMTP/POP/IMAP/... I saw a couple
> of proposals as well as some messages on the list and the current
> state of an email binding (let me call it like this) seems to be
> an ongoing discussion.
>
> My goal is to extend an existing SOAP implementation using HTTP
> towards sending via SMTP and retrieving via POP/IMAP.
>
> The main question I have at this time is how to establish a
> correspondence
> between a requests and its response: I've seen proposals for using
> the Message-ID and In-reply-to headers, but somewhere else I read
> that correspondence should be handled on the application level.
>
> What is the (currently) preferred view of handling request/response
> correlation for SOAP over Email?
>
> Lars
>
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 05:09:29 UTC