Re: encodingStyle

My opinion and my opinion only...

If schema descriptions of XMLP messages are available then no specific
encoding is necessary. A default encoding is useful for environments that do
not have schema support for whatever reason. In these cases the default
encoding acts like an implicit schema. Personally I think the SOAP encoding
stuff in Section 5 of the spec is pretty reasonable apart from the array
stuff.

Gudge

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Frank DeRose" <fderose@home.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: encodingStyle


> Frank DeRose wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > Should the XMLP WG define a default
> > encodingStyle? Should it simply adopt the one from the SOAP spec?
> > Should this problem be turned over to some other W3C WG,
> > like the XML Schema WG?
> > [...]
>
> Anyone from the XML Schema WG willing to offer his/his WG's opinion on
this
> issue?
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>

Received on Thursday, 29 March 2001 10:00:38 UTC