Re: Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1

Actually Dave you do know me. We met at the first SOAP BOF at XTech last
year. I was the short Brit with the crew-cut. And we've exchanged mail
several times on other lists since the SOAP 0.9 spec shipped.

No sarcasm was intended. I *know* you guys are busy. I was just suggesting
that updating to the latest Schema namespace URIs would be an easy edit and
make your document more 'current'. My other comments were intended to be
constructive, I'm trying to help make things more accurate because I find
that having accuracy in documents helps readers.

If you don't want input on the document then you should really state that
either in the document itself or in your introductory mail...

Regards

Martin Gudgin
DevelopMentor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Announce: A Busy Developer's Guide to SOAP 1.1


> Fredrik, since you're on the soapbuilders list, it's important to get your
> pov there as well. What's the takeaway, what do we need to change, and
what
> of these comments are just spurious and not serious?
>
> To Martin, I don't appreciate the (apparent) sarcasm. I don't know you,
it's
> true we are busy, but we care about this stuff, and there are bullies in
> this space who win if we can't get interop soon. We didn't have to do this
> work, we could have stayed with xml-rpc which has interop and has a clear
> unambiguous frozen implementable spec.
>
> Dave

Received on Thursday, 29 March 2001 09:57:53 UTC