- From: Fredrik Lundh <fredrik@pythonware.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:17:21 +0200
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
martin wrote: > 2. xsd:base64 is not a type name. It should be xsd:base64Binary[2] "SOAP-ENC:base64", according to the SOAP specification (section 5.2.3) > 5. You use xsi:type on all your parameter serializations. Why is this? > Seems to me you only need xsi:type when the parameter is a COM Variant/Corba > any/fill in your own dynamically typed thingy here. When the parameter is > always a double why specify in the payload, won't the > marshaller/unmarshaller know what to do not if you're using a dynamically typed language, and don't want to write a WSDL/IDL parser (nor write WSDL/IDL descriptors for everything you want to publish, for that matter). (this works perfectly well in XML-RPC...) > I know you guys are busy developers :-) but you might like to update to the > Proposed Recommendation version of XML Schema given that you've published > this document after the PR Schema spec[4-6] was published. The namespace > uris are; > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema > > and > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance note that there are (at least) two SOAP 1.1 specifications out there; the one from April 18 uses the old namespaces, the W3C version from May 8 uses the new namespaces. Cheers /F
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2001 04:08:52 UTC