RE: Mapping XMLP glossary onto SOAP spec

	From xml-dist-app-request@w3.org Fri Mar 23 23:29 EST 2001
	Delivered-To: jones@research.att.com
	Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 23:21:15 -0500 (EST)
	Resent-Message-Id: <200103240421.XAA20053@www19.w3.org>
	From: "Frank DeRose" <frankd@tibco.com>
	To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
	Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:15:04 -0800
	MIME-Version: 1.0
	Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
	X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
	X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
	X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
	Importance: Normal
	Subject: RE: Mapping XMLP glossary onto SOAP spec
	Resent-From: xml-dist-app@w3.org
	X-Mailing-List: <xml-dist-app@w3.org> archive/latest/1806
	X-Loop: xml-dist-app@w3.org
	Resent-Sender: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
	List-Id: <xml-dist-app.w3.org>
	List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
	List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

	Henrik,

	Section 4.1.1 of the AM doc says:

	<quote>
	If we go with the current XML protocol terminology, I would recommend
	substituting the term "module" for the SOAP term "actor" in the prose below.
	I stuck with "actor" here to maintain familiarity with SOAP.
	</quote>

	Your mapping doesn't relate the SOAP:actor attribute to either an XMLP
	module (or to an XMLP handler). Does this need to be fixed?

	F



This has been fixed in a subsequent version of the AM doc.

--mark

Mark Jones
AT&T Labs

Received on Monday, 26 March 2001 09:36:36 UTC