- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 11:55:23 -0800
- To: "'Frank DeRose'" <frankd@tibco.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I think we might have reached some sort of resolution on targeting in the thread on SOAP actor model [1] and [2] where Staurt summarizes it as follows: Basically: The answer to the question "What sort of thing is an SOAP header/XMLP block target at?" is "A SOAP/XMLP processor and/or it's associated application." I think it is ok that this is not described in the glossary but rather in the AM (we also don't mention mustUnderstand). Henrik [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Mar/0145.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Mar/0128.html ><quote> >If we go with the current XML protocol terminology, I would >recommend substituting the term "module" for the SOAP term >"actor" in the prose below. I stuck with "actor" here to >maintain familiarity with SOAP. </quote> > >Your mapping doesn't relate the SOAP:actor attribute to either >an XMLP module (or to an XMLP handler). Does this need to be fixed?
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2001 14:55:55 UTC