- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:03:42 +0100
- To: "Marc J. Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- CC: "Mark A. Jones" <jones@research.att.com>, Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>, Ray Whitmer <rayw@netscape.com>, Marwan Sabbouh <ms@mitre.org>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>, Stuart Williams <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
"Marc J. Hadley" wrote: > > [MJH] To clarify my question, I meant could a > > single operation, e.g. M1(A) give rise to more > > than one new block being added to the message > > rather than being returned to the originator ? > > Specifically I am thinking of the case where > > M1(A) gives rise to two or more further > > blocks: B, C, ... which may then be consumed > > by later modapps. > > I think we should be supporting returning multiple blocks from handlers. Isn't SOAP already doing this? Jean-Jacques.
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2001 06:04:40 UTC