- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:06:49 -0700
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:50:31AM -0400, Mark Baker wrote: > > I do scratch my head, however, at the attempted application of REST > > to SOAP. I won't say more until I get a bit more up to speed on it ;) > > Heh. Well, FWIW, I believe that the few times I've spoken out with > much rigour is because I felt that a REST-friendly use of SOAP[1] > wasn't given the priority it deserved by the WG, and that SOAP 1.2 > would be unusable to me. I hope you mean that the 'default' HTTP binding would be unusable, not the entire framework, no? Or do these issues leak beyond? > The response code argument[2], the recent "grenade" discussion, > media types, my response (with Randy and Henrik) to the IESG about > Keith Moore's I-D, etc.. The basis of all of those arguments, for > the most part, was my understanding of REST. Yep, that's all clear now; it seems to illuminate a lot of what you've said. Unfortunately, Roy's dissertation isn't exactly compact, but I'll soldier through ;) Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 24 August 2001 02:06:51 UTC