- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: mnot@mnot.net (Mark Nottingham)
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> I do scratch my head, however, at the attempted application of REST > to SOAP. I won't say more until I get a bit more up to speed on it ;) Heh. Well, FWIW, I believe that the few times I've spoken out with much rigour is because I felt that a REST-friendly use of SOAP[1] wasn't given the priority it deserved by the WG, and that SOAP 1.2 would be unusable to me. The response code argument[2], the recent "grenade" discussion, media types, my response (with Randy and Henrik) to the IESG about Keith Moore's I-D, etc.. The basis of all of those arguments, for the most part, was my understanding of REST. [1] http://internet.conveyor.com/RESTwiki/moin.cgi/HowSoapComparesToRest [2] http://internet.conveyor.com/RESTwiki/moin.cgi/SoapFaultsShouldNotUseThe200ResponseCode MB
Received on Friday, 24 August 2001 01:50:30 UTC