Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model

I think that this might be a good approach.

Cheers,

Chris

Hugo Haas wrote:
> 
> * Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com> [2001-08-16 11:59-0700]
> >                        Proposal for a Binding Framework
> [..]
> 
> You consider a combination of bindings (e.g. SMTP+RPC) as a new
> binding requiring a new identifier.
> 
> Once people have come up with lots of different nested bindings
> (attachments, RPC, maybe compression, etc), the number of combinations
> will be fairly high, and a URI for each of them might become
> unworkable.
> 
> Presumably, the binding (and unbinding) of the SOAP message will have
> to be an ordered operation: e.g. XML Infoset -> XML serialization ->
> MIME multipart -> SMTP.
> 
> What about an ordered list of URIs for a combination of bindings?
> 
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092