Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis

Glen Daniels writes:

>> That said, I believe this sort of extension will arise
>> naturally as a result of the later efforts of this
>> group or other groups in the soap community, and that
>> we do not need to tackle such a beast to acheive our
>> goals with respect to the core specification.  I do
>> think the example given (with the caveats above)
>> indicates that our processing model is strong enough to
>> enable specification of this functionality as an
>> extension, which is a good thing.

Sounds right to me.  For the record, I am not pushing
my proposal as necessarily the way we should go.  It
was meant to promote discussion and to flush out the
issues relating to mustUnderstand and partial order,
all of which I believe has happened.  I also agree with
your conclusion that the workgroup need not further
pursue the question of "must happen".  Thanks very much
for working through this.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                                    Voice: 1-617-693-4036
Lotus Development Corp.                            Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 15:33:28 UTC