- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 12:46:19 +0100
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "'Nilo Mitra (EMX)'" <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>, "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Williams, Stuart wrote: > Nilo, > > What you suggest is fine, although I think > that one single-ended definition from the point of view of either SOAP > Receiver or a SOAP Sender would be better: > > ie. > > "At a SOAP Receiver the special URI > "http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope/actor/next" indicates that the > SOAP Header block is targetted at the current SOAP Receiver/Node." > > OR > > "At a SOAP Sender the special URI > "http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope/actor/next" indicates that the > SOAP Header block is targetted at the next SOAP Receiver/Node along the > SOAP Message Path". > > The first avoids the need to mention message path, while the second is > very close to Marc's original. Either would be ok... take your pick! > I prefer the former, it's clearer. Regards, Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> Tel: +44 1252 423740 Int: x23740
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2001 06:18:09 UTC