RE: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType

This particular production confused me also. My main gripe is the
unfamiliar notation used. I agree that because SOAP uses XML it 
should be consistent with XML notation. Learning XML is already 
a chore as it is, let's not make SOAP even more difficult.
--Carlos

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Asir S Vedamuthu
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:26 AM
> To: Rich Salz
> Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org; Ninggang Chen
> Subject: Re: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType
> 
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Any thoughts on my first question -
> 
> a) ...  Are
> there any special reasons for choosing this notation. If not, for
> consistency, may I request you to use the notation used by the 
> XML 1.0 spec?
> 
> / Asir
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>
> To: "Asir S Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>
> Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>; "Ninggang Chen" <ninggang.chen@webmethods.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType
> 
> 
> | SOAP 1.1 and 1.2 use the ABNF from RFC2616 (HTTP) where "#foo" is
> | defined on the top of page 15 as a comma-separated sequence of "foo"
> | items.  They don't use RFC2234.
> | /r$
> | --
> | Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity
> | Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption
> | http://www.zolera.com
> 
>

Received on Monday, 6 August 2001 16:26:30 UTC