RE: DR8xx - message path model

My mistake.  I am comfortable letting this go for now.

_________
Lucas Gonze
WorldOS Corporation
109 Ainslie Street
Brooklyn, NY 11211
lucas@worldos.com
www.worldos.com


> > Regarding 3.4:
> > "intermediaries cannot be implicitly defined but must be an 
> explicit part of the
> > message path model for any data encapsulation language."
> >
> > This is murky about whether message paths themselves need to be 
> explicit.  This
> > wording may be more clear:
> > "Support for intermediaries in a message path must be directly 
> addressed within
> > the specification."
> 
> Lucas, thanks for your text, I think it's clearer; but we are once 
> again hitting
> this same issue: the text was taken directly from the charter, and we 
> are strongly
> encouraged NOT to change the charter!
> 
> David, this seems like an improvement, it would be a pity to loose 
> it; is there
> anything we can do about it?
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 16 November 2000 10:23:28 UTC