- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 04:36:01 -0400
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org, David Turner <dturner@microsoft.com>
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 05:59:05PM -0700, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: Henrik, et al. Sorry I took so long to get to this. > After the SOAP submission as a W3C NOTE, on the page > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix > @(#) $Id: 29-XML-protocol-matrix.html,v 1.16 2000/05/09 20:23:53 > eric Exp $ > > could you please update the SOAP entry as follows: > > * The link to the spec should point to [1] check > * Under "organization", the names should be the ones listed on the W3C > submission request [2] as submitters yup > * "Authors" should be the ones listed on [1] roger > * "Status" should be "W3C NOTE" (if you mean document status - I don't > understand the term "deployed"/"coded") yessir (it was meant to help peope who said "is anyone using foo?" > * There are now two namespaces and two schemas - one of each for the > SOAP envelope [3] and for the SOAP encoding rules [4] respectively. i'm right with you > * The example should be updated (you can take a new one from the W3C > Note) and I would suggest removing the HTTP stuff as it is not used in > any of the other examples that I believe also may be using HTTP or add > it to them all where it makes sense. done > Thanks! sure thing! -- -eric (eric@w3.org)
Received on Sunday, 14 May 2000 04:36:05 UTC