- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:50:34 -0700
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "David Burdett" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "'Eric Prud'hommeaux'" <eric@w3.org>, "Ken MacLeod" <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "Janet Daly" <janet@w3.org>
> > As such, it is not strictly fair to apply requirements to SOAP for which > > it intentionally has nothing to say. I do not argue that the > > requirements that you mention are not important but you also mention > > that they are applicable to a specific set scenarios that may not be > > globally valid. The real question is therefore whether SOAP allows you > > to build such applications while remaining as simple and straight > > forward as possible. > > Really? Is that what everybody else things the real question is? Within the context of requirements applied directly to SOAP, then I think so. David brings up good points - no doubt about that but I think we have to keep in mind which layer(s) they apply to. > I thought David's point about publish/subscribe etc. was very > relevant to the discussion at hand, i.e. what problem, if > any, should W3C charter a working group (or working groups) to solve? Henrik
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2000 19:51:15 UTC