- From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:57:03 GMT
- To: rden@loc.gov
- Cc: www-zig@w3.org
> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:39:11 -0500 > From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov> > > > One possible interpretation is to use the display term for the > > original term. For example, put "S123" into the term field, but > > "SMITH" into the display term. > > That's the intent of the standard. Look at Z39.50-2003; a comment > has been added to this effect in the ASN.1 (comment #11 for the > PDUs). That comment (on p241 of the new standard) says -- Comment 11 Presence of displayTerm means that term is not considered by the server to be suitable for display, and displayTerm should instead be displayed. 'term' is the actual term in the term list; 'displayTerm' is for display purposes only, and is not an actual term in the term list. Which doesn't seem to clear the matter up one way or another. I say that whatever "displayTerm" is used for, "term" itself _must_ be that which can be submitted in a search, which soundex output such as S123 clearly is not -- at least, not for any normal index. Ergo, it can't go in the "term" element of a scan response. The "term" must contain stuff like "Smith" and "Smythe". _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "Never ruin an apology with an excuse" -- Kimberly Johnson. -- Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 08:59:13 UTC