Re: Model question

> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 12:36:39 +0200 (MEST)
> From: "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@elmyra.bsn.com>
> 
>> I'm not in a position to comment on history.  However, I can't let
>> this discussion go past without observing that, in this day and
>> age, there's no reason to perpetuate this historical distinction
>> between databases and result sets -- or, for that matter, between
>> databases/result sets and records.  They're all just lumps of data,
>> structured together in various ways.
>
> Can or should we start to try to apply all the methods in a
> consistent manner across target, result set and presents?

Yes, that's it precisely.  I couldn't have said it better myself.

 _/|_	 _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <mike@indexdata.com>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "No one can make you feel inferior without your consent" --
	 Eleanor Roosevelt.

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
	http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/

Received on Sunday, 27 July 2003 12:58:04 UTC