- From: LeVan,Ralph <levan@oclc.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:04:37 -0500
- To: "'Ray Denenberg'" <rden@loc.gov>, www-zig@w3.org
Let's ask the easier question. Is anyone sending binary data as a general Term? If so, would you share the particulars with us? Thanks! Ralph > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:rden@loc.gov] > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:37 AM > To: www-zig@w3.org > Subject: Re: Octet Strings and utf-8 > > > "LeVan,Ralph" wrote: > > > Somehow I must be deciding if the term is binary, because I > am sending those > > terms to a search engine. The search engine is not > expecting binary data. > > If you have a search engine where binary data isn't > applicable, and you've > negotiated utf-8 (via character set negotiation), and you're > using version 2, so > the client has no choice but to send a term via octet string, > then you might > argue that arbitrarily extending the negotiation to apply to > octet-string-tagged > search terms is a reasonable and pragmatic thing to do. > > Still there is some winking going on, since the client could > only know via > out-of-band agreement that your search engine doesn't expect > binary. It could > be that the search was on title, author, etc. so a binary > term wouldn't make > sense. > > Would someone care to suggest some reliable rule of thumb we > can adopt -- > perhaps based on access point, for example, that if we're > searching on title, > author, subject .... -- that an octet-string-tagged term is > guaranteed to be > text and not binary? > > --Ray > >
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 13:05:51 UTC