RE: back to character encoding

Because I say it does? :-)

Since all the clients I talk to send me their terms in the general option,
and since I must somehow interpret the bytes in that field, I have to do a
conversion anyway.  So, why shouldn't the UTF-8 negotiation apply?

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 1:38 PM
> To: zig
> Subject: Re: back to character encoding
> 
> 
> "LeVan,Ralph" wrote:
> 
> > Yes!  It should apply to the OctetString version of Term.  
> (It does in my
> > server.)
> 
> How do you interpret the character set negotiation definition 
> to apply to
> OctetString?
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 15:32:05 UTC