- From: Pieter Van Lierop <pvanlierop@geac.fr>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:28:31 +0100
- To: zig <www-zig@w3.org>
Please forgive my ignorance but what is ISO 2022 exactly? The choice in the character set negotiation is between: ISO2022 ISO10646 Private ISO2022, as I understand it, is an encapsulation of all classic 7-bits and 8-bits character sets. How many applications use ISO2022? How do I say I send Ascii, or Latin-1? Wouldn't it be better, instead of ISO 2022, to make a list (extendable) of character sets used? We could give them OID's. I think we need the following: ASCII Extended ASCII ANSI ALA Latin-1 Extended-Latin ... probably a few more Pieter van Lierop > -----Message d'origine----- > De : LeVan,Ralph [mailto:levan@oclc.org] > Envoyé : mardi 12 mars 2002 20:59 > À : zig > Objet : RE: back to character encoding > > > Yes! It should apply to the OctetString version of Term. > (It does in my > server.) > > Ralph > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:rden@loc.gov] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:56 AM > > To: zig > > Subject: Re: back to character encoding > > > > > > Pieter Van Lierop wrote: > > > > > I agree. But I would suggest to explicitly include Search > > Term when it is > > > defined as OCTET STRING. > > > > I understand your concern, Pieter, but I don't see any easy > > way to accomplish > > this with the existing character set negotiation definition, > > short of amending > > it (again!). If there is popular support for doing this, > > folks need to speak > > up. > > > > --Ray > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 05:30:25 UTC