- From: Henrik Dahl <hdahl@inet.uni2.dk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 06:43:17 +0200
- To: "'LeVan,Ralph'" <levan@oclc.org>, "'Mike Taylor'" <mike@tecc.co.uk>
- Cc: <Pieter.VanLierop@geac.com>, <www-zig@w3.org>
Ralph, Term is defined like this: Term ::= CHOICE{ general [45] IMPLICIT OCTET STRING, -- values below may be used only if version 3 is in force numeric [215] IMPLICIT INTEGER, characterString [216] IMPLICIT InternationalString, oid [217] IMPLICIT OBJECT IDENTIFIER, dateTime [218] IMPLICIT GeneralizedTime, external [219] IMPLICIT EXTERNAL, integerAndUnit [220] IMPLICIT IntUnit, null [221] IMPLICIT NULL} I understand your point is considering the "general" choice. Why don't you just use characterString instead unless of course it's not really Z39.50-1995 but only Z39.50-1992 you're dealing with? Best regards, Henrik Dahl -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: www-zig-request@w3.org [mailto:www-zig-request@w3.org]På vegne af LeVan,Ralph Sendt: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:44 PM Til: 'Mike Taylor'; LeVan,Ralph Cc: Pieter.VanLierop@geac.com; www-zig@w3.org Emne: RE: character sets: Term as OCTET STRING Sorry, let me be clearer. My proposal was for the general form of a Term (which is an IMPLICIT OCTET STRING) to be included in the negotiation. Not all OCTET STRINGs. Ralph > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Taylor [mailto:mike@tecc.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:17 AM > To: levan@oclc.org > Cc: Pieter.VanLierop@geac.com; www-zig@w3.org > Subject: Re: character sets: Term as OCTET STRING > > > > Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:33:54 -0400 > > From: "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> > > > > I believe that the negotiation does not apply to OCTET STRING. > > Yes. > > > I also believe that this is a mistake and have proposed that OCTET > > STRING be included in the negotiation. > > I would be very uncomfortable about changing this. OCTET STRINGs are > not strings in this sence. (They ought perhaps to be called something > like OCTET SEQUENCES). What if you include in your GRS-1 record a > JPEG image as an OCTET STRING? What would it mean for that to be > subject to negotation? > > Surely InternationalString should be used everywhere that the idea of > character-set negotation makes any sense. > > _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ > /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@miketaylor.org.uk> > www.miketaylor.org.uk > )_v__/\ "Sharing of software is as old as computers, just as sharing > of recipes is as old as cooking" - Richard Stallman. >
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 00:44:20 UTC