- From: Mike Taylor <mike@tecc.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:11:15 +0100 (BST)
- To: levan@oclc.org
- CC: Pieter.VanLierop@geac.com, www-zig@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:43:55 -0400 > From: "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> > > > I would be very uncomfortable about changing this. OCTET STRINGs > > are not strings in this sence. (They ought perhaps to be called > > something like OCTET SEQUENCES). What if you include in your > > GRS-1 record a JPEG image as an OCTET STRING? What would it mean > > for that to be subject to negotation? > > Sorry, let me be clearer. My proposal was for the general form of a > Term (which is an IMPLICIT OCTET STRING) to be included in the > negotiation. Not all OCTET STRINGs. Well, that's less offensive :-) But still, should you not use the InternationalString form when your search term is, er, an international string? If you override the meaning of an OCTET STRING search term, then I have problems when I want to search for Other Images That Look Like This One. (Using the not-quite-finished VAPOUR profile :-) _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@miketaylor.org.uk> www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "... and that's why he's worth seven million pounds" -- Gary Lineker on Andy Cole after a string of hopeless misses in a 0-0 draw vs Aston Villa.
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 11:11:18 UTC