- From: Mike Taylor <mike@tecc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:25:59 GMT
- To: joe.zeeman@TLCdelivers.com
- CC: www-zig@w3.org
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:57:37 -0500 > From: "Johan Zeeman" <joe.zeeman@TLCdelivers.com> > > I've now been bitten for the third time in two days by the stupid > way this list handles replying. (is this new, or is it just me?) > Can it not be possible for this list to be set up like other lists > such that clicking the reply button in my mailer sends a reply to > the list, not to the writer of the message. The list's assumption > that replies are not of interest to the generality of list members > is irritating and offensive. This is a bit of an Old Chestnut. There are a lot of reasons why it's generally Good Behaviour for lists _not_ to set their Reply-To: address to be the whole list, but leave it as the originator of the original message. They are neatly summarised at http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html among other places. > The worst part is that the list appears not even in the "to" part, > but in the "cc". Not sure what you mean by this. In my copy of the message that I'm currenty replying to, the "To:" line says <www-zig@w3.org> and there is no "Cc:" line. Isn't that what you see on messages posted to the list? (Of course, if someone mails _you_, and sends a "Cc:" to the list -- as I'm doing now -- then the message with be "To:" you and "Cc:"d to the list. That's what you'd want and expect, isn't it?) _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@miketaylor.org.uk> www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "He looks around; he sees angels in the architecture, spinning in infinity" -- Paul Simon, "Call Me Al"
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2002 09:26:08 UTC